Indians, American.—GENERAL.—When Columbus landed on the island of San Salvador in 1492 he was welcomed by a brown-skinned people whose physical appearance confirmed him in his opinion that he had at last reached India, and whom, therefore, he called Indios, Indians, a name which, however mistaken in this first application, continued to hold its own, and has long since won general acceptance, excepting in strictly scientific writing, where the more exact term American is commonly used. As exploration was extended north and south it was found that the same race was spread over the whole continent, from the Arctic shores to Cape Horn, everywhere alike in the main physical characteristics, with the exception of the Eskimo in the extreme North, whose features suggest the Mongolian.
Race Type.—-The most marked physical characteristics of the Indian race type are brown skin, dark brown eyes, prominent cheek bones, straight black hair, and scantiness of beard. The colour is not red, as popularly supposed, but varies from very light in some tribes, as the Cheyenne, to almost black in others, as the Caddo and Tarumari. In a few tribes, as the Flatheads, the skin has a distinct yellowish cast. The hair is brown in childhood, but always black in the adult until it turns gray with age. Baldness is almost unknown. The eye is not held so open as in the Caucasian and seems better adapted to distance than to close work. The nose is usually straight and well shaped, and in some tribes strongly aquiline. The hands and feet are comparatively small. Height and weight vary as among Europeans, the Pueblos averaging but little more than five feet, while the Cheyenne and Arapaho are exceptionally tall, and the Tehuelche of Patagonia almost massive in build. As rule, the desert Indians, as the Apache, are spare and muscular in build, while those of the timbered region are heavier, although not proportionately stronger. The beard is always scanty, but increases with admixture of white blood. The mistaken idea that the Indian has naturally no beard is due to the fact that in most tribes it is plucked out as fast as it grows, the eyebrows being treated in the same way. There is no tribe of “ white Indians”, but albinos with blond skin, weak pink eyes, and almost white hair and eyebrows, are occasionally found, especially among the Pueblos. In cubical brain-capacity the Indian is not far behind the white man, but in general intellectual ability, endurance, and vitality he is far inferior. Except when under strong excitement, he is usually more deliberate and less demonstrative than the white man, but is by no means the silent stoic that he has sometimes been represented to be. His most serious moral defects—which appear to be but slightly modified by education or religious teaching—are lack of persistence and of ambition to improve his condition, without which qualities there can be no permanent advancement.
Origin and Antiquity—Various origins have been assigned to the Indian race—from Europe and the East, by way of Greenland or the mythic Island of Atlantis; from Asia, by way of Bering Straits, or lower down, by adventurous voyage from the Polynesian Islands; or as autochthones from a remote geologic period. The Eastern origin has almost as slender foundation as the Atlantis story itself and may be dismissed without argument. The Asiatic theory, both for Bering Straits and the Polynesian Islands, has more advocates, as also more reasons in its favour. The fact that Japanese and other Asiatic adventurers have frequently landed upon the North Pacific coast of America is a matter of history, and tribal tradition and other evidence indicate that such contact was as frequent in prehistoric times, but whether all this has been sufficient to make permanent impression upon the physique or culture, let alone to account for a race, is an open question. For some years this problem has been under systematic investigation by the American Museum of New York City, with promise of important results. So far as at present known, the only permanent migration has been in the opposite direction, an Eskimo tribe from Alaska having taken up permanent residence in Siberia within the historic period.
The theory of autochthonous origin is usually, though not necessarily, connected with that of extreme antiquity, several writers claiming for the Indian, as for the primitive cave man of Europe, an existence contemporaneous with the glacial period. While this theory has many earnest advocates, basing their opinion upon such isolated finds as those of the Trenton gravels, the “Calaveras skull’, and the “Lansing man”, the consensus of scientific opinion is that evidence as to the original placement of these finds in undisturbed strata is not sufficient to establish the claim. With regard to shell heaps and other deposits in mass, the highest estimates of age do not give them more than a few thousand years, and Dall, our best authority for Alaska, allows the oldest middens on the Aleutian Islands not more than three thousand. The more civilized nations, as the Maya, the Totonac, the Muysca, and the Quichua, all probably had their origin, as such, within a thousand years, or within five hundred years of the discovery. Without going back to geologic periods, however, the practical similarity of physical type over both continents implies long occupancy.
The various claims for Jewish, Phoenician, Irish, or Welsh origin have no provable foundation, although the first especially has found advocates for nearly three centuries and has even furnished the motive for the Book of Mormon. The numerous mounds and other earthworks scattered over the eastern United States, with the cliff ruins and other house ruins in the South-West, have also given opportunity for much speculation and theorizing as to the former existence in those regions of highly civilized nations now extinct. Scientific examination, however, shows that the ruins and earthworks are of the most rudimentary architectural character, being rude in construction and inexact and unsymmetrical in dimensional measurements, while the various artifacts found within them are almost precisely identical with those still in use by the uncivilized tribes. The more important house ruins are historically or traditionally known to have been built and occupied by the ancestors of the Pueblo, Pima, and other tribes still inhabiting the same region. Some of the mounds of the eastern section are also known to have been in use as foundations for tribal “town-houses” within the historic period, but the majority of the larger earthworks, as those of Cahokia in Illinois, of Etowah in Georgia, the Serpent Mound and Newark earthworks in Ohio, are much more ancient, and probably originated with more populous tribes which afterwards moved down into more southern regions. The Aztec themselves, according to definite tribal tradition, reached the valley of Mexico from the far North, and linguistic evidence establishes their connexion with the great Shoshonian linguistic stock whose tribes extend almost continuously along the backbone of the continent from the Columbia River to the Isthmus of Panama. In the same way the Apache and Navaho of the Mexican border are known to have emigrated from the frozen shores of the Yukon and Mackenzie. As in Europe and Asia, the general movement was from north to south, but the Algonkian (Ojibwa, etc.) and Siouan (Sioux, etc.) tribes moved westward from the Atlantic seaboard, while the Muskhogean tribes of the Gulf States had their earlier home west of the Mississippi. One great South American stock—the Arawakan—after occupying the Antilles, completed the chain of connexion by planting a .colony in Florida.
Languages.—One of the remarkable facts in American ethnology is the great diversity of languages. The number of languages and well-marked dialects may have reached one thousand, constituting some 150 separate linguistic stocks, each stock as distinct from all the others as the Aryan languages are distinct from the Turanian or the Bantu. Of these stocks approximately seventy were in the northern, and eighty in the southern continent. They were all in nearly the same primitive stage of development, characterized by minute exactness of description with almost entire absence of broad classification. Thus the Cherokee, living in a country abounding in wild fruits, had no word for grape, but had instead a distinct descriptive term for each of the three varieties with which he was acquainted. In the same way he could not say simply, “I am here”, but must qualify the condition as standing, sitting, etc.
The earliest attempt at a classification of the Indian languages of the United States and British America was made by Albert Gallatin in 1836. The beginning of systematic investigation dates from the establishment of the Bureau of American Ethnology under Major J. W. Powell in 1879. For the languages of Mexico and Central America the basis is the “ Geografia” of Orozco y Berra, of 1864, supplemented by the later work of Brinton, in his “ American Race” (1891), and corrected and brought up to latest results in the linguistic map by Thomas and Swanton now in preparation by the Bureau of Ethnology. For South America, we have the “Catalogo” of Hervas (1784), which covers also the whole field of languages throughout the world; Brinton’s work just noted, containing the summary of all known up to that time; and Chamberlain’s comprehensive summary, published in 1907.
To facilitate intertribal communication, we frequently find the languages of the more important tribes utilized by smaller tribes throughout the same region, as Comanche in the southern plains and Navaho (Apache) in the South-West. From the same necessity have developed certain notable trade jargons, based upon some dominant language, with incorporations from many others, including European, all smoothed down and assimilated to a common standard. Chief among these were the “ Mobilian” of the Gulf States, based upon Choctaw; the “Chinook jargon” of the Columbia and adjacent territories on the Pacific coast, a remarkable conglomerate based upon the extinct Chinook language; and the lingoa geral of Brazil and the Parand region, based upon Tupí-Guaraní. To these must be added the noted “sign language” of the plains, a gesture code, which answered every purpose of ordinary intertribal intercourse from Canada to the Rio Grande.
ADELUNG AND Vater, Mithridates oder allgemeine Sprachenkunde (4 vols., Berlin, 1806-17); H. H. Bancroft, Native Races (of the Pacific States) (5 vols., San Francisco, 1882); Brinton, Essays of an Americanist (Philadelphia, 1890); Idem, Myths of the New World (New York, 1868); Ippm, The American Race: Linguistic Classification and Ethnographic Description (New York, 1891); Buscumann, Spuren der aztekischen Sprache (Berlin, 1854 and 1859); Dorsny, Bibliography of the Anthropology of Peru (Field Mus., Chicago, 1898); Fie.tp, Essay Towards an Indian Bibliography (New York, 1873); Gacnon, Essai de bibliographie Canadienne (Quebec, 1895); Hakluyt Society Publications (92 vols., London, 1847-74), old travels, etc.; Hervas, Catalogo delle lingue conosciute (Cesena, 1784); tr. Spanish (6 vols., Madrid, 1800-5, I); Lpcuerc, Bibliotheca Americana (Paris, 1878); Lettres édifiantes et curieuses (Cath. Missions), new ed., America, VI-IX (Toulouse, 1810); Morton, Crania Americana (Philadelphia and London, 1839); Prune, Bibliography of the Languages of the North American Indians (Bur. Am. Ethn., Washington, 1885), reissued in part in series of 9 bulletins of separate linguistic stocks (1887-94); Puvart, Catalogue de livres manuscrits et imprimés (Paris, 1883); Prru, Biblioteca Peruana (2 vols., Instituto Nacional, Santiago de Chile, 1896): pp Souza, Biblioteca Hispano-Americana Setentrional (3 vols., Mexico and Amecameca, 1883); Torres DE Mendoza, ed., Coleccion de documentos ineditos (21 vols., Madrid, 1864-74), dealing with all Spanish-America.
Journals, Institutions, etc.:—Am. ANTHROPOLOGICAL Association, Memoirs (Lancaster); Am. Anthropologist (quar.), I (Washington, 1888), XI (nm. s., Lancaster, 1909); Am. Museum Nat. Hist. (New York), Memoirs, Bulletins, and Anth. Papers; Proceedings of Int. Congress of Americanists (13 vols., 1875-1905); LD Anthropologie (Paris, 1890—); Anthropos (internatnl. Catholic mission auspices), I (Salzburg, 1906) ; Archeological Report (annual, Ontario); Bureau Am. Erunoroay, Ann. Repts., Bulletins, etc. (Washington, 1880—); Canaptan InstTITuTH, Transactions (Toronto, 1890—); Contrib. to North Am. Ethnology (auspices Bur. Am. Ethn. and U. S. Geol. Sur.) (9 vols., Washington, 1877-94); Frectp (Columbian) Museum (Chicago), Anthropological Series, I (1897); Journal of Am. Folklore (Boston, 1888—); Museo pr 1a Prara, Revista (La Plata, Arg.); Museo Nacional pe Buenos Aires, Anales (Mexico); Museu Nactonau DE Rio pr JANEIRO, Archivos (Rio de Janeiro); Prasopy Museum (Harvard Univ.), Memoirs (Cambridge); Smithsonian Institution, Ann. Repts., etc. (Washington, 1846—); Unirep Srates Nat. Museum, Ann. Repts. (Washington); Unity. or California, Pubs. on Am. Arch. and Ethn. (8 vols., Berkeley, 1903-9); Univ. or Pennsylvania, Anthrop. Pubs., I (Philadelphia, 1909); Zeitschrift fir Ethnologie (Berlin, 1868—). UnitTep States, British AMERICA, Etc.—Houses. —In and north of the United States there were some twenty well-defined types of native dwellings, varying from the mere brush shelter to the five-storied stone pueblo. In the Eastern United States and adjacent parts of Canada the prevailing type was that commonly known under the Algonkian term of wigwam, of wagon-top shape, with perpendicular sides and ends and rounded roof, and constructed of stout poles set in the ground and covered with bark or with mats woven of grass or rushes. Doorways at each end served also as windows, and openings in the roof allowed the smoke to escape. Not even Pueblo architecture had evolved a chimney. In general the houses were communal, several closely related families occupying the same dwelling. The Iroquois houses were sometimes one hundred feet in length, divided into compartments about ten feet square, opening upon a central passageway, along which were ranged the fires, two families occupying opposite compartments at the same fire. Raised platforms around the sides of the room were covered with skins and served both as seats and beds. The houses of a settlement were usually scattered irregularly, according to the convenience of the owner, but in some cases, especially on disputed tribal frontiers, they were set compactly together in regular streets and surrounded by strong stockades. The Iroquois stockaded forts had platforms running around on the inside, near the top, from which the defenders could more easily shoot down upon the enemy. In the Gulf States every important settlement had its “town-house”, a great circular structure, with conical roof, built of logs, and devoted to councils and tribal ceremonials. The tipi (the Sioux name for house), or conical tent-dwelling, of the upper lake and plains region was of poles set lightly in the ground, bound together near the top, and covered with bark or mats in the lake country, and with dressed buffalo skins on the plains. It was easily portable, and two women could set it up or take it down within an hour. On ceremonial occasion the tipi camp was arranged in a great circle, with the ceremonial “medicine lodge” in the centre. The semi-sedentary Pawnee, Mandan, and other tribes along the Missouri built solid circular structures of logs, covered with earth, capable sometimes of housing a dozen families. The Wichita and other tribes of the Texas border built large circular houses of grass thatch laid over a framework of poles. The Navaho hogan, was a smaller counterpart of the Pawnee “earth lodge’. The communal pueblo structure of the Rio Grande region consisted of a number—sometimes of hundreds—of square-built rooms of various sizes, of stone or adobe laid in clay mortar, with flat roofs, court-yards, and intricate passageways, suggestive of Oriental things. The Piute wikiup of Nevada was only one degree above the brush shelter of the Apache. California, with its long stretch from north to south and its extremes from warm plain to snowclad sierra, had a variety of types, including the semi-subterranean. Along the whole north-west coast, from the Columbia to the Eskimo border, the prevailing type was the rectangular board structure, painted with symbolic designs and with the great totem pole, carved with the heraldic crests of the owner, towering above the doorway. On the Yukon we find the subterranean dwelling, while the Eskimo had both the subterranean house and the dome-shaped iglu, built of blocks of hardened snow. Besides the regular dwellings, almost every tribe had also some style of temporary structure, besides “sweat houses”, summer arbors, provision caches, etc.
Food and its Procurement.—In the timbered region of the eastern and southern states and the adjacent portions of Canada, along the Missouri and among the Pueblos, Pima, and other tribes of the south-west, the chief dependence was upon agriculture, the principal crops being corn, beans, and squashes, besides a native tobacco. The New England tribes understood the principle of manuring, while those of the arid South-West built canals and practised irrigation. Along the whole ocean coast, in the lake region and on the Columbia, fishing was an important source of subsistence. On the south Atlantic seaboard elaborate weirs were in use, but elsewhere the hook and line, the seine, or the harpoon, were more common. Clams and oysters were consumed in such quantities along the Atlantic coast that in some favourite gathering-places the empty shells are piled into mounds ten feet high. From central California northward along the whole west coast, the salmon was the principal, and on the Columbia almost the entire, food dependence. The north-west coast tribes, as well as the Eskimo, were fearless whalers. Everywhere the wild game, of course, was an important factor in the food supply, particularly the deer in the timber region and the buffalo on the plains. The nomad tribes of the plains, in fact, lived by the buffalo, which, in one way or another, furnished them with food, clothing, shelter, household equipment, and fuel.
In this connexion there were many curious tribal and personal taboos founded upon clan traditions, dreams, or other religious reasons. Thus the Navaho and Apache, so far from eating the meat of a bear, refuse even to touch the skin of one, believing the bear to be of human kinship. For a somewhat similar reason some tribes of the plains and arid South-West avoid a fish, while considering the dog a delicacy.
Besides the cultivated staples, nuts, roots, and wild fruits were in use wherever procurable. The Indians of the Sierras lived largely upon acorns and piñons. Those of Oregon and the Columbia region gathered large stores of camass and other roots, in addition to various species of berries. The Apache and other south-western tribes gathered the cactus fruit and roasted the root of the maguey. The tribes of the upper lake region made great use of wild rice, while those of the Ohio Valley made sugar from the sap of the maple, and those of the southern states extracted a nourishing oil from the hickory nut. Pemmican and hominy are Indian names, as well as Indian inventions, and maple sugar is also an aboriginal discovery. Salt was used by many tribes, especially on the plains and in the South-West, but in the Gulf States lye was used instead. Cannibalism simply for the sake of food could hardly be said to exist, but, as a war ceremony or sacrifice following a savage triumph, the custom was very general, particularly on the Texas coast and among the Iroquoian and Algonquian tribes of the east.
The Tonkawa of Texas.
were known to all their neighbours as the “Man-Eaters”. Apparently the only native intoxicant was tiswin, a sort of mild beer fermented from corn by the Apache and neighbouring tribes.
Domesticated Animals.—The dog was practically the only domesticated animal before the advent of the whites and was found in nearly all the tribes, being used as a beast of burden by day and as a constant sentinel by night, while with some tribes the flesh also was a favourite dish. He was seldom, if ever, trained to hunting. Eagles and other birds were occasionally kept for their feathers, and the children sometimes had other pets than puppies. The horse, believed to have been introduced by the Spaniards, speedily became as important a factor in the life of the plains tribes as the buffalo itself. In the same way the sheep and goats, introduced by the early Franciscans, have become the chief source of wealth to the Navaho, numbering now half a million animals from which they derive an annual income of over a million dollars.
Industries and Arts.—In the fabrication of domestic implements, weapons, ornaments, ceremonial objects, boats, seines, and traps, in house-building, and in the making of pottery and baskets, the Indian showed considerable ingenuity of design and infinite patience of execution. In the division of labour the making of weapons, hunting and fishing requirements, boats, pipes, and most ceremonial objects fell to the men, while the domestic arts of pottery and basket-making, weaving and dressing of skins, the fashioning of clothing, and the preparation and preservation of food commonly devolved upon the women. Among the sedentary or semi-sedentary tribes house-building belonged usually to the men, although the women sometimes assisted. On the plains the entire making and keeping of the tipi were appointed to the women. In many tribes the man cut, sewed, and decorated his own buckskin suit, and in some of the Pueblo villages the men were the basket-weavers.
While the house, in certain tribes, evinced considerable architectural skill, its prime purpose was always utilitarian, and there was usually but little attempt at decorative effect, excepting among the Haida, Tlingit, and others of the north-west coast, where the great carved and painted totem poles, sometimes sixty feet in height, set up in front of every dwelling, were a striking feature of the village picture. The same tribes were notable for their great sea-going canoes, hollowed out from a single cedar trunk, elaborately carved and painted, and sometimes large enough to accommodate forty men. The skin boat or kaiak of the Eskimo was a marvel of lightness and buoyancy, being practically unsinkable. The birch-bark canoe of the eastern tribes was especially well adapted to its purpose of inland navigation. In the southern states we find the smaller “dug-out” log canoe. On the plains the boat was virtually unknown, except for the tub-shaped skin boat of the Mandan and associated tribes on the upper Missouri.
The Eskimo were noted for their artistic carvings bone and walrus ivory; the north-west coast tribes for their slate carving; the Pueblos for their turquoise inlaid work and their wood-carving, especially of mythologic figurines; and the Atlantic and California coast tribes for their work in shell. The wampum, or shell beads, made chiefly from the shells of various clams found along the Atlantic coast, have become historic, having been extensively used not only for dress ornamentation, but also on treaty belts, as tribal tribute, and as a standard of value answering the purpose of money. The ordinary stone hammer or club, found in nearly every tribe, represented much patient labour, while the whole skill of the artist was frequently expended upon the stone-carved pipe. The black stone pipes of the Cherokee were famous in the southern states, and the red stone pipe of catlinite from a single quarry in Minnesota was reputed sacred and was smoked at the ratification of all solemn tribal engagements throughout the plains and the lake region. Knives, lance-blades, and arrow-heads were also usually of stone, preferably flint or obsidian. Along the Gulf Coast keen-edged knives fashioned from split canes were in use. Corn mortars and bowls were usually of wood in the timber region and of stone in the arid country. Hide-scrapers were of bone, and spoons of wood or horn. Metal work was limited chiefly to the fashioning of gorgets and other ornaments hammered out from native copper, found in the southern Alleghenies, about Lake Superior, and about Copper River in Alaska. The art of smelting was apparently unknown. Under Franciscan and later Mexican teaching the Navaho have developed a silver-working art which compares in importance with their celebrated blanket weaving, the material used being silver coins melted down in stone moulds of their own carving. Mica was mined in the Carolina mountains by the local tribes and fashioned into gorgets and mirrors, which found their way by trade as far as the western prairies. All of these arts belonged to the men.
The making of pottery belonged to the women and was practised in nearly all the tribes, excepting those of the plains and interior basin, and the cold north. The Eastern pottery was usually decorated with stamped patterns. That of the Pueblo and other south-western tribes was smooth and painted with symbolic designs. A few specimens of glazed ware have been found in the same region, but it is doubtful if the process is of native origin. The Catawba and some other tribes produced a beautiful black ware by burning the vessel under cover, so that the smoke permeated the pores of the clay. The simple hand process by coiling was universally used.
Basket-weaving in wood splits, cane, rushes, yucca-~ or bark-fibre, and various grasses was practised by the same tribes which made pottery, and, excepting in a few tribes, was likewise a woman’s work. The basket was usually stained in various designs with vegetable dyes. The Cherokee made a double-walled basket. Those of the Choctaw, Pueblo tribes, Jicarilla, and Piute were noted for beauty of design and execution, but the Pomo and other tribes of California excelled all in closeness and delicacy of weaving and richness of decoration, many of their grass baskets being water-tight and almost hidden under an interweaving of bright-coloured plumage, and further decorated around the top with pendants of shining mother-of-pearl. The weaving of grass or rush mats for covering beds or wigwams may be considered as a variant of the basket-making process, as likewise the delicate porcupine quill appliqué work of the northern plains and upper Mississippi tribes.
The useful art of skin-dressing also belonged exclusively to the women, excepting along the Arctic coasts, where furs, instead of denuded skins, were worn by the Eskimo, while the entrails of the larger sea animals were also utilized for waterproof garments. The skins in most general use were those of the buffalo, elk, and deer, which were prepared by scraping, stretching, and anointing with various softening or preservative mixtures, of which the liver or brains of the animal were commonly a part. The timber tribes generally smoked the skin, a process unknown on the plains. A limited use was made of bird skins with the feathers intact.
The weaving art proper was also almost exclusively in the hands of the women. In the East, aside from basket- and mat-making, it was confined almost entirely to the twisting of ropes or bowstrings and the making of belts, the skin fabric taking the place of the textile. In the South-West the Pueblo tribes wove native cotton upon looms of their own device, and, since the introduction of sheep by the Franciscan missionaries in the sixteenth century, the Navaho, enlarging upon their Pueblo teaching, have developed a weaving art which has made the Navaho blanket famousthroughout the country, the stripping, spinning, weaving, and dyeing of the wool being all theirown. The Piute of Nevada and others of that region wore blankets woven from strips of rabbit fur. Some early writers mention feather-woven cloaks among the Gulf tribes, but it is possible that the feathers were simply overlaid upon the skin garment.
It is notable that the Indian worker, man or woman, used no pattern, carrying the design in the head. Certain designs, however, were standardized and hereditary in particular tribes and societies.
Games and Amusements.—Naturally careless of the future, the Indian gave himself up to pleasure when not under the spur of immediate necessity or danger, and his leisure time at home was filled with a constant round of feasting, dancing, story-telling, athletic contests, and gambling games. The principal athletic game everywhere east of the Missouri, as well as with some tribes of the Pacific coast, was the ballplay, adopted by the French of Canada under the name of lacrosse and in Louisiana as raquette. In this game the ball was caught not with the hand, but with a netted ball-stick somewhat resembling a tennis racket. A special dance and secret ceremonial preceded the contest. Next in tribal favour in the eastern region was the game known to the early traders under the corrupted Creek name of chunkee, in which one player rolled a stone wheel along the ground, while his competitor slid after it a stick curved at one end like an umbrella handle, with the design of having the spent wheel fall within the curve at the end of its course. This game, which necessitated much hard running, was sometimes kept up for hours. A somewhat similar game, played with a netted wheel and a straight stick, was found upon the plains, the object being to dart the stick through certain netted holes in the wheel, known as the buffalo bull, calf, etc. Foot-races were very popular with certain tribes, as the Pueblos, Apache, Wichita, and Crows, being frequently a part of great ceremonial functions. On the plains horse-racing furnished exciting amusement. There were numerous gambling games, somewhat of the dice order, played with marked sticks, plum stones, carved bones, etc., these being in special favour with the women. Target shooting with bow and arrow, and various forms of dart throwing were also popular. Among distinctly women’s games were football and shinny, the former, however, being merely the bouncing of a ball from the toes with the purpose of keeping it in the air as long as possible. Hand games, in which a number of players ranged themselves in two opposing lines and alternately endeavoured to guess the whereabouts of a small object shifted rapidly from hand to hand, were a favourite tipi pastime with both sexes in the winter evenings, to the accompaniment of songs fitted to the rapid movement of the hands. Story-telling and songs, usually to the accompaniment of the rattle or small hand-drum, filled in the evening. The Indian was essentially musical, his instruments being the drum, rattle, flute or flageolet, eagle-bone whistle, and other more crude devices. Each had its special religious significance and ceremonial purpose, particularly the rattle, of which there were many varieties. Besides the athletic and gambling games, there were games of divination played only on rare occasions of tribal necessity with sacred paraphernalia in the keeping of special guardians. The Indian was fond also of singing and had songs for every occasion—love, war, hunting, gaming, medicine, satire, children’s songs, and lullabies.
The children played with tops, whips, dolls, and other toys, or imitated their elders in shooting, riding, and “ playing house”.
War.—As war is the normal condition of savagery, so to the Indian warlike glory was the goal of his ambition, the theme of his oratory, and the purpose of his most elaborate ceremonial. His weapons were the knife, bow, club, lance, and tomahawk, or stone axe, which last was very soon superseded by the light steel hatchet supplied by the trader. To these certain tribes added defensive armour, as the body armour of rawhide or wooden rods in use along the north-west coast and in some other sections, and the shield more particularly used by the equestrian tribes of the plains. As a rule, the lance and shield were more common in the open country, and the tomahawk in the woods. The bow was usually of some tough and flexible wood with twisted sinew cord, but was sometimes of bone or horn backed with sinew wrapping. It is extremely doubtful if poisoned arrows were found north of Mexico, notwithstanding many assertions to the contrary.
Where the clan system prevailed the general conduct of war matters was often in the keeping of special clans, and in some tribes, as the Creeks, war and peace negotiations and ceremonials belonged to certain towns designated respectively as “red” and “white”. With the Iroquois, and probably with other tribes, the final decision for war or peace rested with a council of the married women. On the plains the warriors of a tribe were organized into military societies of differing degrees of rank, from the boys in training to the old men who had passed their active period. Military service was entirely voluntary with the individual, who, among the eastern tribes, signified his acceptance in some public manner, as by striking the red-painted war-post, or, on the plains, by smoking the pipe sent Big Bow and Son, Kiowa Indians, IN FULL BUCKSKIN DRESS round by the organizers of the expedition. Contrary to European practice, the command usually rested with several leaders of equal rank, who were not necessarily recognized as chiefs on other occasions. The departure and the return were made according to fixed ceremonial forms, with solemn chants of defiance, victory, or grief at defeat. In some tribes there were small societies of chosen warriors pledged never to turn or flee from an enemy except by express permission of their fellows, but in general the Indian warrior chose not to take large risks, although brave enough in desperate circumstance.
To the savage every member of a hostile tribe was equally an enemy, and he gloried as much in the death of the infant or its mother as in that of the warrior father. Victory meant indiscriminate massacre, with most revolting mutilation of the dead, followed in the early period in nearly every portion of the East and South by a cannibal feast. The custom of scalping the dead, so general in the later Indian wars, has been shown by Friederici to have been confined originally to a limited area east of the Mississippi, gradually superseding the earlier custom of beheading. In many western tribes the warrior’s prowess was rated not by the number of his scalp trophies, but by the number of his coups (French term) or strokes upon the enemy, for which there was a regular scale according to kind, the highest honour being accorded not to the one who secured the scalp, but to the warrior who struck the first blow upon the enemy, even though with no more than a willow rod. The scalp dance was performed not by the warriors, but by the women, who thus rejoiced over the success of their husbands and brothers. There was no distinctive “war dance”.
Captives among the eastern tribes were either condemned to death with every horrible form of torture or ceremonially adopted into the tribe, the decision usually resting with the women. If adopted, he at once became a member of family, usually as representative of a deceased member, and at once acquired full tribal rights. In the Huron wars whole towns of the defeated nation voluntarily submitted and were adopted bodily into the Iroquois tribes., On the plains torture was not common. Adults were seldom spared, but children were frequently saved and either regularly adopted or brought up in a mild sort of slavery. Along the north-west coast and as far south as California slavery prevailed in its harshest’ form and was the usual fate of the captive.
Social Organization —Among most of the tribes east of the Mississippi, among the Pueblos, Navaho, and others of the South-West, and among the Tlingit and Haida of the north-west coast, society was based on the clan system, under which tribe was subdivided into a number of large family groups, the members of which were considered as closely related and prohibited from intermarrying. The children usually followed the clan of the mother. The clans themselves were sometimes grouped into larger bodies of related kindred, to which the name of phratries has been applied. The clans were usually, but not always, named from animals, and each clan paid special reverence to its tutelary animal. Thus the Cherokee had seven clans, Wolf, Deer, Bird, Paint, and three others with names not readily translated. A Wolf man could not marry a Wolf woman, but might marry a Deer woman, or one of any other of the clans, and his children were of the Deer or other clan accordingly. In some tribes the name of the individual indicated the clan, as “Round Foot” in Wolf clan and “Crawler” in the Turtle clan. Certain functions of war, peace, or ceremonial were usually hereditary in special clans, and revenge for injuries within the tribe devolved upon the clan relatives of the person injured. The tribal council was made up of the hereditary or elected chiefs of clans, and any alien taken into the tribe had to be specifically adopted into a family and clan.
The clan system was by no means universal, as supposed by Morgan and his followers of forty years ago, but is now known to have been limited to particular regions, and seems to have been originally an artificial contrivance to protect land and other property descent. It was absent almost everywhere west of the Missouri, excepting in the South-West, and appears also to have been unknown throughout the greater part of British America, the interior of Alaska, and probably among the Eskimo. Among the plains tribes the unit was the band, whose members camped together under their own chief in an appointed place in the tribal camp circle and were subject to no marnee prohibition, but usually married among themselves.
With a few notable exceptions, there was very little idea of tribal solidarity or supreme authority, and where a chief appears in history as tribal dictator, as in the case of Powhatan in Virginia, it was usually due to his own strong personality. The real authority was with the council as interpreter of ancient tribal customs. Even such well-known tribes as the Creeks and Cherokee were really only aggregates of closely cognate villages, each acting. independently or in co-operation with the others as suited its immediate convenience. Even in the smaller and more compact tribes there was seldom any provision for coercing the individual to secure common action, but those of the same clan or band usually acted together. In this lack of solidarity is the secret of Indian military weakness. In no Indian war in the history of the United States has a single large tribe ever united in solid resistance, while on the other hand other tribes have always been found to join against the hostiles. Among the Natchez, Timucua, and some other southern tribes, there is more indication of a central authority, resting probably with a dominant clan.
The Iroquois (q. v.) of New York had progressed beyond any other native people north of Mexico in the elaboration of a state and empire. Through a carefully planned system of confederation, originating about 1570, the five allied tribes had secured internal peace and unity, by which they had been able to acquire dominant control over most of the tribes from Hudson Bay to Carolina, and, if not prematurely checked by the advent of the whites, might in time have founded a northern empire to rival that of the Aztec.
Land was usually held in common, excepting among the Pueblos, where it was apportioned among the clans, and in some tribes of northern California, where individual right is said to have existed. Timber and other natural products were free, and hospitality was carried to such a degree that no man kept what his neighbour wanted. While this prevented extremes of poverty, on the other hand it paralysed individual industry and economy, and was an effectual barrier to progress. The accumulation of property was further discouraged by the fact that in most tribes it was customary to destroy all the belongings of the owner at his death. The word for “brave” and “generous” was frequently the same, and along the north-west coast there existed a curious custom known as potlatch, under which a man saved for half a lifetime in order to acquire the rank of chief by finally giving away his entire hoard at a grand public feast.
Enslavement of captives was more or less common throughout the country, especially in the Southern states, where the captives were sometimes crippled to prevent their escape. Along the north-west coast and as far south as California, not only the captives, but their children and later descendants were slaves and might be abused or slaughtered at the will of the master, being frequently buried alive with their deceased owner or butchered to provide a ceremonial cannibal feast. In the Southern slave states, before the ‘Civil War, Indians were frequent owners of negro slaves.
Men and women, and sometimes even the older children, were organized into societies for military, religious, working, and social purposes, many of these being secret, especially those concerned with medicine and women’s work. In some tribes there was also a custom by which two young men became “brothers” through a public exchange of names.
The erroneous opinion that the Indian man was an idler, and the Indian woman a drudge and slave, is founded upon a misconception of the native system of division of labour, under which it was the man’s business to defend the home and to provide food by hunting and fishing, assuming all the risks and hardships of battle and the wilderness, while the woman attended to the domestic duties, including the bringing of wood and water, and, with the nomad tribes, the setting up of the tipi. The children, however, required little care after they were able to run about, and the housekeeping was of the simplest, and, as the women worked usually in groups, with songs and gossip, while the children played about, the work had much of pleasure mixed with it. In that chiefly concerned the home the woman was the mistress, and in many tribes the woman’s council gave the final decision upon important matters of public policy. Among the more purely agricultural tribes, as the Pueblos, men and women worked in the fields together. In the far North, on the other hand, the harsh environment seems to have brought out all the savagery of the man’s nature, and the woman was in fact a slave subject to every whim of cruelty, excepting among the Kutchin of the upper Yukon, noted for their kind treatment of their women. Polygamy existed in nearly all tribes excepting the Pueblos.
Religion and Mythology.—The Indian was an animist, to whom every animal, plant, and object in nature contained a spirit to be propitiated or feared. Some of these, as the sun, the buffalo, and the peyote plant, the eagle, and the rattlesnake, were more powerful or more frequently helpful than others, but there was no overruling “Great Spirit” as so frequently represented. Certain numbers, particularly four and seven, were held sacred. Colours were symbolic and had local abiding place, and sometimes sex. Thus with the Cherokee the red spirits of power and victory lived in the Sun Land, or East, while the black spirits of death dwelt in the Twilight Land of the West. Certain tribes had palladiums around which centred
Wichita Grass Houses their most elaborate ritual. Each man had also his secret personal “medicine”. The priest was likewise the doctor, and medicine and religious ritual were closely interwoven. Secret societies were in every tribe, claiming powers of prophecy, hypnotism, and clairvoyance. Dreams were in great repute, and implicitly trusted and obeyed, while witches, fairies, and supernatural monsters were as common as in medieval Europe. Human sacrifices, either of infants or adults, were found among the Timucua of Florida, the Natchez of Mississippi, the Pawnee of the plains, and some tribes of California and the north-west coast, the sacrifice in the last-mentioned region being frequently followed by a cannibal feast. From time to time, as among more civilized nations, prophets arose to purify the old religion or to preach a new ritual. Each tribe had its genesis, tradition, and mythical hero, with a whole body of mythologic belief and folklore, and one or more great tribal ceremonials. Among the latter may be noted the Green-Corn Dance thanksgiving festival of the eastern and southern tribes, the Sun Dance of the plains, the celebrated Snake Dance of the Hopi (q. v.), and the Salmon Dance of the Columbia tribes.
Burial—The method of disposing of the dead varied according to the tribe and environment, inhumation being probably the most widespread. The Hurons and Iroquois allowed the bodies to decay upon scaffolds, after which the bones were gathered up and deposited with much ceremony in the common tribal sepulchre. The Nanticoke and Choctaw scraped the flesh from the bones, which were then wrapped in a ‘bundle and kept in a box within the dwelling. Tree, scaffold, and cave burial were common on the plains and in the mountains, while cremation was the rule in the arid regions farther to the west and south-west. Northward from the Columbia the body was deposited in a canoe raised upon posts, while cave burial reappeared among the Aleut of Alaska, and earth burial among the Eskimo, The dread of mentioning the name of the dead was as universal as the custom of destroying the property of the deceased, even to the killing of his horse or dog, while the custom of placing food near the grave for the spirit during the journey to the other world was almost as common. Laceration of the body, cutting off of the hair, general neglect of the person, and ceremonial wailing, morning and evening, sometimes for weeks, were also parts of their funeral customs.
Language and Population.—Nearly two hundred native languages, besides minor dialects, were spoken north of Mexico, classified into fifty-one distinct linguistic stocks, as given below, of which nearly one-half were represented in California. Those marked with an asterisk are extinct, while several others are now reduced to less than a dozen individuals keeping the language: Algonquian, Athapascan (Déné), Attacapan, ∗Beothukan, Caddoan, Chimakuan, ∗Chimarikan, Chimmesyan, Chinookan, Chitimachan, ∗Chumashan, ∗Coahuiltecan (Pakawa), Copehan (Wintun), Costanoan, Eskimauan, ∗Esselenian, Iroquoian, Kalapooian, ∗Karankawan, Keresan, Kiowan, Kitunahan, Koluschan (Tlingit), Kulanapan (Pomo), ∗Kusan, Mariposan (Yokuts), Moquelumnan (Miwok) Muskogean, Pujunan (Maidu), Quoratean (Karok), ∗Salinan, Salishan, Shahaptian, Shoshonean, Siouan, Skittagetan (Haida), Takilman, ∗Timucuan, ∗Tonikan, Tonkawan, Uchean, ∗Waiilatpuan (Cayuse), Wakashan (Nootka), Washoan, Weitspekan (Yurok), Wishoskan, Yakonan, ∗Yanan (Nosi), Yukian, Yuman, Zuñian.
While the Indian population was never dense, the idea that the Indian has held his own, or even actually increased in number, is a serious error, founded upon the fact that most official estimates begin with the Federal period, when the native race was already wasted by nearly three centuries of white contact and in many regions entirely extinct. An additional source of error is the fact that the law recognizes anyone of even remote Indian ancestry as entitled to Indian rights, including in this category, especially in the former “ Five Civilized Nations” of Indian Territory (now Oklahoma), several thousand individuals whose claims have always been stoutly repudiated by the native tribal courts. Moreover, the original Indian was a full-blood, while his present-day representative has often so little aboriginal blood as to be practically a white man or a negro. Many broken tribes of to-day contain not a single full-blood, and some few not even one of half Indian blood. The Cherokee Nation, officially reported to number 36,000 persons of pure or mixed Cherokee blood contains probably not 4000 of even fairly pure blood, the rest being of all degrees of admixture down even to one-sixty-fourth or less of Indian blood, besides some 7000 claimants officially recognized, but repudiated - by the former Indian Government. In Massachusetts an official census in 1860 reported a “ Yarmouth tribe” of 105 persons, all descended from a single Indian woman with a negro husband residing there in 1797. It is obvious that the term Indian cannot properly be applied to such diluted mixtures.
The entire aboriginal population of Florida, of the mission period, numbering perhaps 30,000, is long since extinct without descendants, the Seminole being a later emigration from the Creeks. The aborigines of South Carolina, counting in 1700 some fifteen tribes, of which the Catawba, the largest tribe, numbered some six thousand souls, are represented to-day by about a hundred mixed-blood Catawba, together with some scattered mongrels, whose original ancestry is a matter of doubt.
The same holds good upon the plains. The celebrated Pawnee tribe of some 10,000 souls in 1838 is now reduced to 650; the Kansa of 1500 within the same period have now not 200 souls; and the aborigines of Texas, numbering in 1700 perhaps 40,000 souls in many small tribes with distinct languages, is extinct except for some 900 Caddo, Wichita, and Tonkawa. The last-named, estimated at 1000 in 1805, numbered 700 in 1849, 314 in 1861, 108 in 1882, and 48 in 1908, including several aliens. In California the aboriginal population has decreased within the same period from perhaps a quarter of a million to about 15,000, and nearly the same proportion of decrease holds good along the whole Pacific Coast into Alaska. Not merely have tribes dwindled, but whole linguistic stocks have become extinct within the historic period. The only apparent exceptions to the general rule of decay are the Iroquois, Sioux, and Navaho, the first two of whom have kept up their number by wholesale adoptions, while the Navaho have been preserved by their isolation. The causes of decrease may be summarized as: (1) introduced diseases and dissipation, particularly smallpox, sexual diseases, and whisky; (2) wars, also hardship and general enfeeblement consequent upon frequent removals and enforced change from accustomed habit. The present Indian population north of Mexico is approximately 400,000, of whom about 265,000 are within the United States proper.
Arctic, ALASKA, British AMERICA.—BACcK, Arctie Land Expedition (1838-6) (London, 1836); H. H. Bancroft, Hist. of Alaska (San Francisco, 1886); Idem, Hist. of the Northwest Coast (2 vols., San Francisco, 1886); Ipmm, Hist. of British Columbia (San Francisco, 1887); Boas, Salish Tribes of the Interior of Br. Columbia in Can.-Arch. Rept. (Toronto, 1905); Ipmm, Indian Languages of Canada, ibid.; Ipmm, Social Organization of the Kwakiutl in Rept. Nat. Mus. (Washington, 1897); Ide.m, The Central Eskimo in Sixth Rept. Bu. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1888); Idem, Tribes of the North Pacific Coast in Can. Arch. Rept. (Toronto, 1905); Ipmm, Mythology of the Bella Coola Indians in Am. Mus. Mem. (New York, 1898); Ipmm, Kwakiutl Texts in Am. Mus. Mem. (2 vols., New York, 1902); Iprem, Eskimo of Baffin Land and. Hudson Bay in Am. Mus. Bul. (New vec ington Idem, Indianische Sagen von der nordpacifischen Kiiste (Berlin, 1895); IpeMm, Reports on Northwestern Tribes of Canada in N. Br. Assn. Adv. Sci. (1889, 1898); CHAMBERLAIN, The Kootenai Indians in Rept. Br. Assn. Adv. Sci.; Crantz, Hist. of Greenland (German, 1765; tr., 2 vols., London, 1767); Dali, Alaska and its Resources (Boston, 1879); Ipmm, Tribes of the Extreme Northwest in Contr. N. Am. Ethn., I (Washington, 1877); Dawson, Report on Queen Charlotte Islands in Geol. Survey Can. (Montreal, 1880); Franklin, Journey to the Polar Sea (1819-22) (London, 1823—); Hau, Arctic Researches (1860-62) (New York, 1866); HEARNE, Journey to the Northern Ocean (1769-72) (London, 1795—); Henry, Travels in Canada (1760-76) (New York, 1809); Hrii-Tovur, Salish Tribes of British Columbia in Repts. Br. Assn. Adv. Sci.; Htnp, Canadian Red River Expedition (1857-8) (2 vols., London, 1860); Ipem, The Labrador Peninsula (2 vols., London, 1863); Indian Affairs in Ann. Repts. of the Dept. of Ottawa; Jesuit Relations (see United States below); Kane, Wanderings of an Artist (London, 1859); Krause, Die Tlinkit Indianer (Jena, 1885); Larirrau, Meurs des sauvages amériquains (2 vols., Paris, 1724); Lord, Naturalist in Vancouver Island and Br. Col. (2 vols., London, 1866); MAcKENziB, Voyages to the Frozen and Pacific Oceans (1789-93) (London, 1801); McLean, Twenty-five Years in the Hudson Bay Ter. (2 vols., London, 1842); Morice, The Western Dénés in Can. Inst. Trans. (Toronto, 1904); Ipmem, Hist. of Northern Interior of British Columbia (Toronto, 1904); Ipmm, The Great Déné Race in Anthropos,1906—9; Murvocsa, The Point Barrow Expdn. (1881-8) in Ninth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1892); Nelson, The Eskimo about Bering Strait in Eighteenth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth., I (Washington, 1901); Nrsuack, Coast Indians of Southern Alaska, etc. (Sm. Inst., Washington, 1890); Parkman (see below U. S.); Paray, Second Voyage for the Discovery of a Northwest Passage (182i—3) (London, 1824); Pérousr, Voyage autour du Monde (1786-8) (4 vols., Paris, 1797; tr., 2 vols., London, 1799) Petitot, Traditions Indiennes du Canada Nord-Ouest (Paris, 1886); IppmM, Monographie des Déné Dindjie (Paris, 1876); Idem, Quinze ans sous le cercle polaire (Paris, 1889); PrTrRoFF, Report on Alaska (Washington, 1884); Rasmussen, The People of the Polar North (London, Philadelphia, 1908); Richardson, Arctic Searching Expdn. (2 vols., London, 1851); Rink, Tales and Traditions of the Eskimo (London, 1875); Russruu, Lxplorations in the Far North (Univ. of Iowa, Iowa City, 1898); Sproat, Scenes and Studies of Savage Life (London, 1868); Swanton, Haida Texts: Masset Dialect in Am. Mus. em. (New York, 1908); Idem, Haida Texts and Myths in Bull. Bu. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1905); Idem, The Tlingit Indians in Twenty-sixth Rept. Bu. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1907); Terr, Thompson River Indians of Br. Columbia in Mem. Am. Mus. (New York, 1900); Turner, Ethnology of the Ungava District in Eleventh Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1894); Whymper, Travel in Alaska (London, 1868).
United States.—Apssorr, Primitive Industry (Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1881); Aparr, Hist. of the Am. Inds. (London, 1775); American State Papers: Class II, Indian Affairs (Washington, 1832); H. H. Bancroft, Histories: California (7 vols., San Francisco, 1886-90); Arizona and New Mexico (San Francisco, 1889); Utah (San Francisco, 1889); Nevada, Colorado and Wyoming (San Francisco, 1890); Washington, Idaho and Montana (San Francisco, 1890); Bandelier, Contributions to Hist. and Archeology of Southwestern U. S. (Hemenway Expdn.) (Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1890); Barcia (Cardenas Y Cano), Ensayo Cronolégico (Madrid, 1723); Barrett, The Pomo and Neighboring Indians (Univ. of Cal., Berkeley, 1908); Iprm, Pomo Basketry (Berkeley, 1908); Bartram, Travels through North and South Carolina (Philadelphia, 1791); Bossu, Nouveaux voyages dans l’'Amérique Septentrionale (Paris, 1768; Paris and Amsterdam, 1778); Brinton, The Floridian Peninsula (Philadelphia, 1859); Casnca pg Vaca, Relacion (Seville, 1542: tr. Smith, New York, 1871); Carver, Travels through the Interior Parts of N. Am. (1766-8) (London, 1781); Catlin, North Am. Indians (2 vols., London, 1841); Charlevoix, Histoire et description générale de la Nouvelle France (3 vols., Paris, 1744; tr. Sues, 6 vols., New York, 1866-1870); Clark, The Indian Sign Language (Philadelphia, 1885); Colden, Hist. of the Five Indian Nations of N. Y. (New York, 1727; ed. Sua New York, 1866); Cox, Adventures on the Columbia River (2 vols., London, 1831); Curtis, The Indian’s Book (New York and London, 1907); Davis, Spanish Conquest of New Mexico (Doylestown, 1869); De Forest, Hist. of the Indians of Conn. (Hartford, 1852); Dickenson, God’s Protecting Providence (Philadelphia, 1699); Dorsey, Mythology of the Wichita (Carnegie Inst., Washington, 1904); Ipmm, The Cheyenne (2 pts., Field Mus., Chicago, 1905); Idem, Traditions of the Arikara (Washington, 1903); Ipmm, The Pawnee (Carnegie Inst., 2 vols., Washington, 1906); Dorsey and Kroeber, Traditions of the Arapaho (Field Mus., Chicago, 1903); Drake, Biog. and Hist. of the Indians of N. America (11th ed., Boston, 1857); Durror pE Morras, Exploration de l’ Orégon(Paris, 1844); Dumont, Mémoires sur la Louisiane (2 vols., Paris, 1753); Fewkes in Journal of Am. Ethn. and Arch. (Pueblo Hemenway Expdn.) (4 vols., Boston, 1891-94); Frercuer, Omaha Indian Music (Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1893); Forbes, California, Upper and Lower (London, 1839): Frrpertcr, Skalpieren und ahnliche Kriegsgebriuche (Brunswick, 1906); French, ed., Hist. Colls. of Louisiana (6 vols., New York, 1846-69); GALratin, Synopsis of Indian Tribes in Arch. Americana, Ii (Cambridge, 1836); GARCILASO DE LA Vu@a, La Florida del Ynca (Lisbon, 1605; Madrid, 1723); Gatscunr, The Karankawa Indians of Texas (Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1891); Ipmm, Migration Legend of the Creek Indians (2 vols., Philadelphia, 1884; St. Louis, 1885); Idem, The Klamath Indians of Oregon, Contr. N. Am. Eth., 11 (Washington, 1890); Ipmm, The Timucua Language, 3 pts., in Am. Philos. Soc. Proc. (Philadelphia, 1877-80); Gooxin, Christian Indians of Massachusetts (1674) in Archeologia Americana, II (Cambridge, 1836); Harior, Briefe and True Report (Va.) (Frankfort, 1590; New York, 1871); Hawkins, Sketch of the Creek County (Savannah, 1848); Hayprn, Indian Tribes of the Missouri Valley (Philadelphia, 1862); Heckewelder, Mission of the United Brethren (Philadelphia, 1820); Ipmm, Hist. Manners and Customs of the Indians [of] Pennsylvania (Philadelphia, 1819); Hope, Handbook of Am. Inds., Bull. Bur. Am. Ethn. (2 vols., Washington, 1907-08); Houmas, Art in Shell of the Ancient Americans, Second Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1883); Ipmm, Pottery of the Ancient Pueblos, Fourth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1886); Idem, Ancient Art of Chiriqui, Sixth Rept. etc. (1888); Ipmm, Stone Implements of the PotomacChesapeake Tidewater, Fifteenth Rept. etc. (1897); Ipmm, Aboriginal Pottery of the Eastern United States, Twentieth Rept. etc. (1903); Hrpuicxa, Physiological and Medical Observations (Southwestern Inds.), Bul. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1908); Annual Reports of Commissioner of Indian Affairs (Washington, 1824—); Irvine, Conquest of Florida (New York, 1857); JAMES, Narrative of the Captivity of James Tanner (New York, 1830); Jones, Antiquities of the Southern Indians (New York, 1873); Kappuer, Indian Affairs; Laws and Treaties (2 vols., Washington, 1904); Koutu, Kitcht Gami (Ojibwa Inds.) (London, 1860); Kroeber, The Arapaho in Buls. Am. Mus. (New York, 1902-7); Ive, California Indian Papers in Univ. of California Pubs. (Berkeley, 1903-9); Lawson, Hist. of Carolina (London, 1714; Raleigh, 1860); Lz Moyne, Narrative (Florida, 1564) (Latin ed., Frankfort, 1591; tr., Boston, 1875); Le Pace pu Pravtz, Hist..de la Louisiane (3 vols., Paris, 1758; tr., London, 1763 and 1774); Lewis and Clark, Original Journals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition (1804-06), ed. Tuowaires (8 vols., New York, 1904-5), the latest and most complete of many editions; Lone, Hxpdn. to the Rocky Mts. (1819-20) (3 vols., London, 1823); Loupon, Narratives (Indian Captivities etc.) (2 vols., Carlisle, 1808-11); McCoy, Baptist Indian Missions (Washington and New York, 1840); McKgpnnrey and Hatt, Hist. of the Indian Tribes (coloured portraits) (3 vols., Philadelphia, 1837); Mautery, Pictographs of the North Am. Inds. in Fourth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1886); Margry, Découvertes et établissements des Francais (6 vols., Paris, 1879-86); Matthews, Hidatsa Indians (Washington, 1877); Ipmm, The Night Chant in Am. Mus. Mem. (New York, 1902); Massachusetts Hist. Soc. Colls. (40 vols., Boston, 1792-1871); Maurautr, Hist. des Abenakis (Quebec, 1866); Maximilian, Prince or WIED, Travels in the Interior of N. America (2 vols., Coblenz, 1839-41; tr., London, 1843); Mooney, The Siouan Tribes of the East, Bul. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1894); Ipem, Ghost Dance Religion in Fourteenth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1896); Idem, Calendar Hist. of the Kiowa in Seventeenth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1898); Ipem, Myths of the Cherokee in Nineteenth Rept. Bur. Am, Eth. (Washington, 1900); Moorn, Archeological Explorations (southern coast), chiefly in Jour. Acad. Nat. Sciences (Philadelphia, 1892-1909); ORGAN, League of the Hodenosaunee or Iroquois (Rochester, 1851); Ippm, Systems of Consanguinity in Smithsonian Contr.,X VIIL(Washington, 1871); Morss, Report on Indian Affairs (New Haven, 1822); Does. Relative to the Colonial Hist. of N. Y., O’CALLAGHAN ed. (11 vols., Albany, 1856-61); PARKMAN, Conspiracy of Pontiac (Boston. 1866); Ip, Jesuits in North Am. (Boston, 1867); Idem, Discovery of the Great West (Boston, 1869); Ipmm, Count Frontenac and NewFrance (Boston, 1878); Idem, Montcalm and Wolfe (2 vols., Boston, 1884); Idem, Half Century of Conflict (2 vols., Boston, 1892); Powers, Tribes of California in Contr. N. Am. Eth., Ill (Washington, 1877); Relations des Jésuites (3 vols., Quebec, 1858); Ross, Adventures on the Columbia River (London, 1849) Ipmm, Fur Hunters of the Far West (2 vols., London, 1855); Royce and Thomas, Indian Land Cessions in Eighteenth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1902); Russell, The Pima Indians in Twenty-sixth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1908); Rurrenser, Indian Tribes of Hudson’s River (Albany, 1872); Rye, Discovery and Conquest of Florida (tr. with notes of Elvas and Biedma narratives of De Soto expedition; Hakluyt Soc., London, 1851); Schoolcraft, Algic Researches (3 vols., New York, 1839); Idem, Notes on the Iroquois (Albany, 1847); Idem, Thirty Years with the Indian Tribes (Philadelphia, 1851); Ipmem, History, Condition and Prospects of the Indian Tribes (6 vols., Philadelphia, 1851-7); Suma, Disc. and Exploration of the Miss. Valley (New York, 1853); Idem, Hist. a Catholic [Indian] Missions of the U. S. (New York, 1855): SIMPSON, Military Reconnaissance from Santa Fe to the Navajo Country (Philadelphia, 1852); pe Smet, Oregon Missions ete. (1845-46) (New York, 1847; Fr. tr., Paris, 1848); Ipmm, Western Missions and Missionaries (New York, 1863); B. Smrru, Hernando deSoto; Elvas and Biedma Relations in Bradford Club Series, No. 5 (New York, 1866); John Smrru, Generall Historie of Virginia, etc. (London, 1624; Arsmrr, ed., Birmingham, 1885); Col. J. Smrru, Captivity with the Indians (1755-9) (Lexington, 1799); Squrpr AND Davis, Ancient Monuments of the Miss. Valley in Smithsonian Contrib. (Washington, 1848); Stevenson, The Zuri Indians in Twenty-third Rent. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1904); Srracuey, Historie of Travaile into Virginia (c. 1612) (Hakluyt Soc., London, 1849); Swan, The Northwest Coast (New York, 1857); Thomas, Report on Mound Explorations in Twelfth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1894); THrusTON, Antiquities of Tennessee (Cincinnati, 1890); Thwaites, see Jesuits above; Treaties, see KAPPLER above; WARREN, Hist. of the Ovibways in Minn. Hist. Soc. Colls., V (St. Paul, 1885): Wuirtn, Relatio Itineris in Marilandiam (1635-8) (Latin and English, Maryland Hist. Soc., Baltimore, 1874); Wrturams, Key into the Language of America (London, 1643) in Rhode Island Hist. Soc, Colls., 1 (Providence, 1829); Wisconsin Hist. Soc. Colls. (15 vols., Madison, 1855-1900); Yarrow, Mortuary Customs of the North Am. Inds. in First Rept. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1881).
Mexico, Central AMERICA, AND West INDIES.— Between the Rio Grande and the Isthmus of Panama was a large number of tribes, constituting some twenty-five linguistic stocks, and representing every degree of culture from the lowest savagery to a fairly advanced civilization. Lowest of all were the tribes of the California peninsula, with the Seri of Tiburon Island. Of somewhat higher grade, but still savages, were the dwellers in the low coast-lands of Honduras, Nicaragua, and Costa Rica. The Tarumari, Tepehuan, Huichol, and others of the northern sierras were about on a level with our own Pueblo tribes, while the Aztecs, Totonac, Tarasco, Zapotec, and Mistec, the Maya, Kiché, and Cakchiquel, of the central regions, might almost be considered civilized nations, counting their citizens by hundreds of thousands, with agriculture and all the common industrial arts, a well-developed architecture, an established and orderly government, and a voluminous hieroglyphic literature.
As in the United States, the general direction of migration seems to have been from north to south, excepting for the tribes of Chibchan stock, an offshoot from the main body in Colombia. The celebrated Aztec, whose tribes occupied the valley of Mexico and its immediate environs, had a definite tradition of northern origin, and linguistic evidence shows them to have been closely cognate to the Pima’ and Shoshoni, while their culture was borrowed from the earlier and much more cultured, but less warlike, nations which they had overpowered some five centuries before their own conquest by Cortés in 1519. The empire which they had built up comprised many tribes of diverse stocks, held together only by the superior force of the conqueror, and easily disintegrated under the assaults of the Spaniards. The native civilizations, however, have left their permanent stamp upon both Mexico and Central America.
In general characteristics, the cultures of the several civilized nations were very similar. Agriculture was the basic industry and dependence; mountain-terracing, canal irrigation, and even floating lake-gardens, being all utilized to meet the necessities of a swarming population. Stone, and more particularly obsidian, was still the chief material for ordinary implements, but they had discovered the art of bronze-casting, and were expert designers in gold. The working of iron— the master metal—was practically unknown upon the American Continent. They were neatly clothed in cotton garments of various colours. Their pottery, especially that of the Tarasco, was beautiful both in design and manufacture, with glazed surface and inlay of precious metal. Their public architecture included magnificent temples and pyramids, of cut and polished stone set in mortar and covered with hieroglyphic inscriptions. The ruined cities of the Maya of Yucatan—Mayapan, Uxmal, and Chichén-Itzá, with scores of others, all occupied at the time of the conquest with such older ruins as Teotihuacan, and Copan, and Mitla—rival the great remains of classical antiquity.
The social and political organization seems to have been based upon the family group. There was a system of public education in which boys were taught military science, writing, and religious ritual, while girls were instructed in morals and domestic arts. Each civilized nation had an elaborate calendar system, that of the Maya proper being the most intricate, with cycles of 20, 52, and 260 years. The religious systems were characterized by the number and magnificence of their ceremonials, with armies of priests and priestesses, processions, feasts, and sacrifices, and by the general bloody tenor of their rituals, especially among the Aztec, who yearly sacrificed thousands of captives to their gods, the bodies of the victims being afterwards eaten by the priests or by the original captors. The Maya religion, like the people, appears to have been of milder character, although still admitting human sacrifice. In all these nations the king was of absolute authority. Whole libraries of native literature existed, chiefly of ritual content, written in iconomatic or hieroglyphic characters upon paper of maguey fibre. Of those which have escaped the fanaticism. of the first conquerors some of the most noted (Aztec) are exemplified in Lord Kingsborough’s great work. Of the Maya nations the most valuable literary monument is the “ Popol Vuh” of the Kiché of Guatemala, translated by the Abbé Brasseur de Bourbourg. For a comprehensive view of these native civilizations our best authorities are Gomara and Herrera, of the earlier period, with Prescott and Hubert H. Bancroft of our own time. In spite of the exterminating wars of the conquest and the subsequent awful oppression under the slave system, the descendants of the aboriginal races—largely Christianized and assimilated to Spanish forms—still constitute the great bulk of the population between the Rio Grande and the Isthmus.
The ruder coast tribes of Central America present no very distinguishing cultural features, subsisting by a limited agriculture, supplemented by hunting and fishing, without arts, monuments, or history of importance. The Ulva of Honduras practised head-flattening. The Carib of the same region were forced immigrants from the Antilles.
Practically the whole of the West Indies was occupied by tribes of two linguistic stocks, the earlier of Arawakan origin, the more recent being Cariban invaders from the northern coast of South America. The Arawakan aborigines were about in the cultural status of our own Gulf tribes, subsisting chiefly by agriculture and practising the simpler arts, but unfitted by their peaceful habit to withstand the inroads of the predatory Carib, whose very name is synonymous with “cannibal”. Under the awful cruelties of their Spanish conquerors and taskmasters they were virtually exterminated within two generations of the discovery (see ARAWAKS).
As commonly recognized, the linguistic stocks represented in Mexico, Central America, and the West Indies were about twenty-five in number, as given below, those marked with an asterisk being also extra-limital: ∗Athapascan (Chihuahua etc.); ∗Cariban (Honduras and islands); Chiapanecan (Chihuahua, Nicaragua, Costa Rica); ∗Chibchan (Panama); Chinantecan (Oaxaca); Huavean (Oaxaca); Lencan (Honduras); Maratinian, or Tamaulipecan (Tamaulipas); Matagalpan (Nicaragua); Mayan (Yucatan, Tabasco, Chiapas, Guatemala); Mosquitan (Honduras); ∗Nahuatlan Shoshonian (Mexico, etc.); Olivean (Tamaulipas); Otomian (Guerrero, etc.); ∗Pakawan, or Coahuiltecan (Coahuila); Payan (Honduras); Serian (Sonora); Subtiaban (Nicaragua); Tarascan (Michoacan); Tequistlatecan (Oaxaca, Guerrero); Totonacan (Vera Cruz); Ulvan (Nicaragua ete.); Waikurian (California); Xanambrian (Tamaulipas) ; Xicaquan (Honduras); Xincan (Guatemala); ∗Yuman (California).
ALEGRE, Historia de la Compariia de Jestis en Nueva Esparta (3 vols., Mexico, 1841); BAGrrr, Nachrichten von der amerikanischen Halbinsel Californien (Mannheim, 1773), tr., incomplete, Rau, Aborigines of Lower California in Rept. Smithson. Instn. (Washington, 1863); H. H. BAncrort, Hist. of Mexico (6 vols., San Francisco, 1886-88); Iprm, Hist. of the North Mexican States and Texas (2 vols., San Francisco, 1886-89); Ipmm, Hist. of Central America (3 vols., San Francisco, 1886-7); Bandelier, Art of War of the Ancient Mexicans (Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1877); Idem, Distribution of Lands and Customs of Inheritance (Mexico) (Cambridge, 1878); Ipmm, Social Organization of the Ancient M exicans (Cambridge, 1879); Barp (Squier), Waikna: the Mosquito Shore (New York, 1855); Borrurtnt, Nueva Historia General de la Am. Septentrional (Madrid, 1746); Idem, J. dea de una nueva hist. general de la América Septentrional (Aztec hieroglyphs and bibliography) (Madrid, 1746); BowpircnH, tr. and ed., Mexican and Central Am. Antiquities (from German of SELER, Forstemann, SCHELLHAS, Sapper, and DigseLporrr in Bul. Bur. Am. Eth. (Washington, 1904); BRASSEUR pe Bourbodrg, Nations civilisées du Mexique et de VL Amérique Centrale (Pre-Columbian) (4 vols., Paris, 1857); Iprm, Coll. de documents dans les langues indigenes (Mexico, Central America, and Haiti, including Popol. Vuh of Quiches) (4 vols., Paris, 1861-68); Carritio y Ancona, Historia antigua de Yucatan (1868; 2nd ed., Mérida, 1882); Cuavicrro, Historia antica del Messico (Cesena, 1780), tr. Cullen, Hist. of Mexico (2 vols., London, 1787); Inrm, Storia della California (2 vols., Venice, 1789; tr. Sp. Mexico, 1852); Duparx, Antiquités Mexicaines (2 vols., Paris, 1834); Engelhardt, Franciscans in California (Harbor Springs, Mich., 1897); F ANCOURT, Hist. of Yucatan (London, 1854); Frwxers, Aborigines of Porto Rico, in Twenty-fifth Rept. Bur. Am. Eth, (Washington, 1907); Idem, Antiquities of Eastern Mexico, ibid.; FORSTEMANN, Commentary on the Dresden Maya MS. (Orig. Ger., Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1906); also see Bowpircu; Gomara, Historia general de las Indias (Saragossa, 1554); Idem, Hist. de las Conquistas de Hernando Cortés (reprint) (2 vols., Mexico, 1826); Hartman, Archeological Researches in Costa Rica (Carnegie Mus., Pittsburg, 1907); Holmes, Archeological Studies among the Ancient Cities of Mexico (Field Mus., 2 rpts., Chicago, 1895-97); Humso1pt, Vues des Cordilleras (Paris, 1810), tr. Researches Concerning the Ancient Inhabitants of Am. (2 vols., London, 1814); IXTLILXOCHITL., Histoire des Chichméques (tr. from Sp. MS., 2 vols., Paris, 1840; also Sp. in Kinasporoucu, IX; Fr. in TERNAUX-COMPANS series); KinesBoroucn, Antiquities of Mexico (9 vols., London, 1831-48); Leon, Los Tarascos (3 pts., Mexico, 1901—-and numerous papers, chiefly in Anales del Museo Nacional; Lumuourz, Symbolism of the Huichol Inds. in Am. Mus. Mem. (New York, 1900); Inrem, Unknown Mexico (2 vols., New York, 1902); Mater, The Usumasintla Valley in Peabody Mus. Memoirs, II and IV (Cambridge, 1901-03-08); Martyr, Hist. of the West Indies (orig. Sp. ed., 1504-30; tr., London, 1597); Mayer, Mexico: Aztec, Spanish and Republican (Hartford, 1853); Mora Papiixa, Conquista de la Nueva Galicia (Mexico, 1870); Norru, The Mother of California (San Francisco, New York, 1908); Nurrauu, Fundamental Principles of Old and New World Civilization (Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1901); Ippm, Codex Nuttall (Peabody Mus., Cambridge, 1902); Idem, Book of Life of the Ancient Mexicans (2 vols., Univ. of Cal., Berkeley, 1903-09); Orozco xy Berra, Geografia de las Lenguas y Carta etnografica de México (Mexico, 1864); Pimentel, Lenguas Indigenas de Mexico (2 vols., Mexico, 1862-65; 3 vols., 1874-75); Prescott, Hist. of the Conquest of Mexico (3 vols., New York and London, 1843); Rrsas, Triumphos de Nuestra Santa Fé (Madrid, 1645); Sahagun, Historia General de Nueva Espana (1529-1590) (3 vols., Mexico, 1829); Seer, Gesammelte Abhandlungen zur amerikanischen Sprach- und Alterthums-Lunde (Berlin, 1902); IpmmM, Reisebriefe aus Mexiko (Berlin, 1889); Ipem, Auf alter Wegen in Mexiko und Guatemala (Berlin, 1900); Iprem, Codex Fejervary (Berlin, 1901; tr., Berlin, 1901-02); IpeM, Codex Vaticanus (2 vols., Berlin, 1902); Squizr, Central America (2 vols., New York, 1853); Ipmm, Nicaragua (New York, 1852); Ippm, Original Documents and Relations (Guatemala etc.) (New York, 1860); Stephen, Incidents of Travel in Central America, Chiapas and Yucatan (2 vols., New York, 1841; 25 eds.); Iprem, Incidents of Travel in Yucatan (2 vols., New York, 1843); Ternaux-compans, Voyages, Relations et Mémoires originaux etc. (20 vols., Paris, 1837-40); TorquEmaAbA, Monarchia Indiana ete. (3 vols., Madrid, 1613; Barcia, ed., 3 vols., Madrid, 1723); Vennaas, Noticia de la California (3 vols., Madrid, 1757; tr., 2 vols., London, 1759); ViuLacuTIERRA Soto-Major, Conquista de la Provincia de el Itza (Madrid, 1701); Virtua SeXNor ¥ Sancuez, Theatro Americano (2 vols., Mexico, 1746; Madrid, 1748); Ximenes, Origen de los Indios (Guatemala) (Scherzer, ed., Vienna, 1857); Young, Residence on the Mosquito Shore (1839-41) (London, 1842). See also Unrrep States and South AMERICA.
Sourn America.—On the South American Continent there existed prior to European occupation a chain of highly developed native civilizations extending along the Andean Plateau from the Isthmus southward into Chile, while all the rest—including the narrow coast strip along the Pacific and the great forests and pampas stretching eastward to the Atlantic—were occupied by petty tribes of primitive culture status, from the sedentary agriculturists of the middle Orinoco and the Parand, to the rude savages of Tierra del Fuego.
Among the civilized nations, in order from north to south, were the Muysca or Chibcha of Colombia, the Yunca and Quichua of Peru, and the somewhat problematic Aymara of the Peru-Bolivia frontier. Of these the most populous, most important, and best known were the Quichua, whose great Empire of Peru, with its capital at Cuzco, dominated the whole region west of the great Cordillera from the Chibcha territory to about the 35th parallel in Chile, with outlying colonies among the Calchaqui of Catamarca, east of the Andes chain. Their ruling caste, the Incas, who claimed descent from the sun and to whom belonged the emperors and the nobility, appear to have been originally the nucleus tribe of the empire, which in the course of centuries had gradually absorbed and assimilated almost all the tribes of cognate Quichuan stock, together with a number of other tribes and nations of alien stocks and of greater or less degree of culture. Unlike the Aztec, who held the subjected tribes only by superior force, the Inca emperors pursued a systematic policy of removal and colonization with reference to the conquered tribes under which tribal differences rapidly disappeared, and the new subjects were completely fused into the body of the empire. The government, while nearly absolute, was mild and paternal, looking carefully after the welfare of every class and citizen, defining their privileges and duties, and holding each to a strict account in its contribution to the general welfare. The religion partook of the same benevolent character, having none of the bloody sacrificial and cannibalistic rites of the Aztec. The material civilization was probably the most advanced in aboriginal America, agriculture, pottery-making, weaving, and metal-working in gold and bronze being at their highest, while the stupendous temples, fortresses, and roads, in massive cut stone, were without parallel on the Continent and still defy the centuries. In sculptural art, however, they were behind the Aztec, Maya, and other northern nations, and in anything literary had not progressed beyond a simple system by means of quipus or knotted cords. Among the best accounts of the Inca civilization is that contained in Prescott’s ‘Conquest of Peru”, a description which will apply with approximate correctness to the others of the Andean region. The Chibcha race was virtually exterminated by the Spanish conquerors in their thirst for gold, but in Ecuador, Peru, and Bolivia the descendants of the old civilized nations still constitute the bulk of the population, and the Quichua is the dominant language outside of the cities.
The Araucanians (q. v.) of southern Chile, who have successfully resisted all attempts at their subjugation to the present day; the Moxos tribes of southern Bolivia and their neighbours, the Calchaqui of Argentina; the populous Guarani tribes of the Paraguay; and the majority of the tribes of the middle Orinoco, were chiefly sedentary and agricultural in habit, and fairly well advanced in the simple native arts, including pottery-making, weaving, and the preparation of tapioca flour from the manioc root. The tribes of the great Amazon basin and of eastern Brazil, as a rule, were primarily hunters or fishers, and of lower culture, as were also the predatory equestrian tribes of the Chaco, central Argentina, and Patagonia, while the Ona and others of inclement Tierra del Fuego exemplified the lowest degree of savagery, being without clothing, shelter, structure, or any art worthy of the name. Cannibalism prevailed over a large portion of the continent, especially among the Botocudo, Guarani, and others of the Parand and eastern Brazil, in portions of Guiana and the great Orinoco region, and on some of the upper streams of the Amazon. Social organization and tribal laws and government, excepting among the sedentary tribes of the more southern region, were very loosely defined, and the religion of all seems to have been a simple animism, with apparently much less of ceremonial form than was common among the tribes of similar grade on the northern continent, probably due to the nature of the tropical wilderness, which made it difficult to come together in large numbers.
The eastern tribes were terribly wasted by the organized slave-raiders in the earlier period and until the Jesuits armed them for effective defence in the seventeenth century. Civilization, with its introduced vices and new diseases, particularly smallpox, has been as destructive to them as to other savage races, and, in spite of missionary effort and sporadic government protection in some states, they seem rapidly marching to final extinction.
As tabulated by Chamberlain, our most recent authority (South American Linguistic Stocks, 1907), the number of South American linguistic stocks was approximately eighty, as given below, the list being liable to some change with more extended investigation. Of these the Tupian, or Tupi-Guarini, alone occupies the greater portion of Brazil and Paraguay, and forms the basis of the lingoa geral or trade language. Alikulufan (Tierra del Fuego), Andaquian (Colombia), Apoliston (Bolivia), Arauan (Brazil), Araucan or Aucan (Chile), Arawakan (Venezuela, &c.), Ardan (Ecuador), Atacameñan (Chile), Aymaran? (Peru, Bolivia), Barbacoan (Colombia), Betoyan (Colombia, Venezuela), Bororoan (Brazil), Calchaquian (Argentina), Canarian (Peru-Ecuador), Canichanan (Bolivia), Carajan (Brazil), Cariban(Venezuela, Guiana, &c.), Caririan (Brazil), Cayubaban (Bolivia), Changoan (Chile), Chayacuran (Bolivia), Charruan, (Uruguay), Chibchan (Colombia), Chiquitan (Bolivia), Chocoan (Colombia), Cholonan (Peru), Chonoan (Chile), Churoyan (Colombia), Coenucan (Colombia), Corabecan (Bolivia), Cunan (Colombia), Curucunecan (Bolivia), Curuminacan (Bolivia), Enomagan (Paraguay), Goyatacan (Brazil), Guahiban (Colombia), Guaraunan (Venezuela), Guatoan (Bolivia-Brazil), Guaycuran (Argentina), Itenean (Bolivia), Itonaman (Bolivia), Itucalean (Peru), Jivaran (Ecuador), Laman (Peru), Lecan (Bolivia), Lorenzan (Peru), Lulean (Argentina), Mainan (Ecuador), Makuan (Brazil), Matacan (Argentina, Paraguay), Miranhan (Brazil), Mocoan (Colombia), Mosetenan (Bolivia), Moviman (Bolivia), Muran (Brazil), Ocoronan (Bolivia), Onan (Tierra del Fuego), Otomacan (Venezuela), Otuquian (Bolivia), Paniquitan (Colombia), Panoan (Peru), Peban (Peru, Ecuador), Piaroan (Colombia, Venezuela), Puelchean (Argentina), Puinavian (Colombia), Puquinan (Peru), Quichuan (Peru, Ecuador, &c.), Salivan (Venezuela), Samucan (Bolivia), Tacanan (Bolivia), Tapuyan (Brazil, Colombia), Ticunan (Brazil), Timotean (Venezuela), Tupian (Brazil, Paraguay, Bolivia, &ec.), Trumaian (Brazil), Tsonekan (Argentina), Uitotan (Brazil), Yahganan (Tierra del Fuego), Yaruran (Venezuela—Colombia), Yuncan (Peru), Yurucaran (Bolivia), Zaparan (Ecuador).
Acosta, Historia natural y moral de las Indias (Seville, 1590; tr., London, 1604); Idem, De Natura Novi Orbis (Salamanca, 1588-9); Acuna, Nuevo descubrimiento del gran Rio de las Amazonas (Madrid, 1641); tr. Voyages and Discoveries in South America (London, 1698), also in Hakluyt Soc. Reps. (1859); Ambrowetti, Yxploraciones Arqueológicos (Calchaquis) (Univ. of Buenos Aires, 1906-08); Azara, Voyages dans l’ A méri-que Méridionale (1781-1801) (4 vols., Paris, 1809); Barrére, Nouv. relation de la France Equinoxiale (Guiana) (Paris, 1743); Bates, Naturalist on the Amazon (London, 1863); Benzoni, Historia del mondo nuovo (Venice, 1565; tr., Hakluyt Soc., London, 1857); Bouuanrt, Antiquarian, Ethnological and Other Researches (Andes region) (London, 1860); Boman, Antiquités de la région Andine (2 vols., Paris, 1908); Bournnr, Captive in Patagonia (Boston, 1858); Boyerant, I Caduvet (Mbayá, or Guaycuru) (Rome, 1895); Brett, Indian Tribes of Guiana (New York, 1852); Castelnau, Expédition dans V Amérique du Sud (1843-7) (Paris, 1852); Chamberlain, South American Linguistic Stocks in Proc. Congress of Americanists (Quebec, 1907); Charlevoix, Histoire du Paraguay (3 vols., Paris, 1756; tr., 2 vols., London, 1769); CHervin, Anthropologie Bolivienne: Sénéchal et La Grange Mission Scientifique (Paris, 1907-8); CHILE, Colleción de Documentos Inéditos (Santiago, 1899); Creza, Historia de Pert (Seville, 1553), tr. Travels through the Mighty Kingdom of Peru (London, 1709); Colombia: Geographical Account of that Country (2 vols., London, 1822); Dobrizhoffer (published in Latin, Vienna, 1784), tr. Account of the Abipones (London); Exrenrercn, Anthropolog. Studien (Brazil) (Brunswick, 1897); Forbes, Aymara Indians of Bolivia and Peru in Ethn. Soc. Journal, N. S., 11 (London, 1870); Garcilaso DE LA VEGA, Commentarios reales de el origen de los Incas (Lisbon, 1609; Madrid, 1723), tr. Hakluyt Soc. (2 vols., London, 1869); Idem., Historia general del Perú (Cordova, 1617; Madrid, 1722); tr. of both, Royal Commentaries of Peru (London, 1688) Graham, A Vanished Arcadia (Paraguay missions) (London, 1901); T. GUEVARA, Psicologia del pueblo Araucano (Santiago, 1908); Idem, Historia de la civilización de Araucania (Santiago, 1900); J. Guevara, Historia del Paraguay, Rio de Plata y Tucuman (Buenos Aires, 1836); Gumr1Lua, Historia Natural de las Naciones del Rio Orinoco (2 vols., Barcelona, 1741; French tr., 3 vols., Avignon, 1758); Helps, The Spanish Conquest in America (4 vols., London, 1861); Herdon, Exploration of the Valley of the Amazon (2 vols. and maps, Washington, 1854); HerRERA, Historia General de los Hechos de los Castellanos (4 vols., Madrid, 1601, 1720; tr. French, 3 vols., Paris, 1671; mutilated tr., 6 vols., London, 1740); Humspoitpr and Bonpland, Personal Narrative of Travels to the Equinoctial Regions (1799-1804) (tr., 8 vols., London, 1818; Bohn Library, 3 vols., London, 1852-3); Las Casas, Brevissima relacion de la destruyción de las Indias (Seville, 1552), tr. Relation of the First Voyages (London, 1699), tr. Latin, Italian, German, Dutch; tr. French in @wuwvres (Paris, 1810); pz Lury, Voyage en la Terre du Brésil (3rd ed., Paris, 1585); Lozano, Historia de la Comp. de Jesús en Paraguay (2 vols., Madrid, 1754-5); MAGALHANES DE Gondaro, Histoire de la province de Santa Cruz (i. e. Brazil) (Lisbon, 1572; tr. French, Paris, 1637); Marcoy, Voyage a travers l’'Amérique du Sud (2 vols., Paris, 1869) (fine engravings); Markham, Cuzco: A Journey to the Ancient Capital of Peru (London, 1856); Idem, Grammar and Dictionary of Quichua (Peru) (London, 1864); Idem, Travels in Peru and India (London, 1862); Idem, Ollanta: An Ancient Ynca Drama (London, 1871); Idem, List of Tribes in the Valley of the Amazon in Journ, Anth. Inst., XXIV (London, 1895); Medina, Los Aborigines de Chile (Santiago, 1882); Molina, Geographical, Natural and Civil History of Chili (Bologna, 1782, also Spanish and German tr.; tr. 2 vols., Middletown, 1808); Montoya, Conquista espiritual del Paraguay (Lima?, 1639); Muratori, Relation of the Missions of Paraguay, tr. (London, 1759); p’OrBiany, L’Homme Américain de lV Amérique M éridionale (3 vols., Paris, 1839); Ortega, Apostol. afanes de la Compañia de Jesús (Barcelona, 1754); Orton, The Andes and the Amazon (1870); Outes, Estudios etnograficos (Querndi, etc.) (Buenos Aires, 1894-8); Marcano, Ethnographie précolumbienne du Venezuela; Page, La Plata, the Argentine Confederation and Paraguay (New York, 1859); Prescott, History of the Conquest of Peru (2 vols., London, 1847); Raleigh, Discovery of Guiana (orig. ed., 1596; London, Hakluyt Soc., 1848); Reclus, The Earth and its Inhabitants: South America, tr. Keane (2 vols., New York, 1894-5); Rivet, Les Indiens Jibaros in L’ Anthropologie (Paris, 1907, 1908); Riviero and Tsohudi!, Antiquedades Peruanas (Vienna, 1851), tr. Hawks (New York, 1853); Saville, Antiquities of Manabi, Ecuador (Heye Expdn.) (New York, 1907); Seymour, Pioneering in the Pampas (Cotie don, 1869); Simon, Expedition in Search of El Dorado and Omagua in 1560-61, tr. (Hakluyt Soc., London, 1861); Smith, The Araucanians (New York, 1855); Smyth, Journey from Lima to Para Conese 1836); Spix and Martius, Reise nach Brasilien (1817-20) (3 vols., Munich, 1824-31), tr. Travels in Brazil (London, 1824); Squier, Peru: Exploration in the Land of the Incas (New York, 1877); SrapgEn, Véritable Histoire (Brazilian Indians) (Paris, 1837), tr. from German (Marburg, 1557); von per Steixen, Durch Central Brasilien (1884) (Leipzig, 1886); Idem, Unter den Naturvilker Zentral Brasiliens (1887-8) (Berlin, 1894); Suaree, Historia General del Ecuador (9 vols., Quito, 1890-1903); Tschudi, Peru: Reiseskizzen (18388— 42) (2 vols., St. Gall, 1844), tr. Travels in Peru (London, 1847; New York, 1865); Ternaux-Compans, see under Mexico; IM Thurn, Among the Indians of Guiana (1883); Unir, Kultur und Industrie südamerikanischer Volker (1889); Idem, Explorations in Peru (archæology) (Univ. of Cal., Berkeley); Unim and Stubel, Ruinstätte von Tiahuanaco, Peru (Breslau, 1892); Ulloa, Noticias Americanas (Madrid, 1747, 1772, 1792), tr. Fr., Mémoires philosophiques (2 vols., Paris, 1787); Uricocura, Antiquedades Neo-Granadinas (Berlin, 1854); Wallace, Travels on the Amazon and Rio Negro (London, 1853); pE ZARATE, Hist. de la découverte et de la Conquéte du Pérou (2 vols., Paris, 1716, 1830), from the Spanish (Antwerp, 1555), tr. (London, 1581). See also above: Mexico; CENTRAL AMERICA; and the WEST Indies.
James Mooney.